Case 39
Comment on “PEOPLE v. FOREST - Leagle.com”!Read original article Comment on “PEOPLE v. FOREST - Leagle.com”!Comments

Game: Case 39 | Subscribe RSS 2.0 | Comment, or trackback |

Source: http://www.leagle.com/favicon.icowww.leagle.com - Thursday, July 29th, 2010 at 7:52 am

"<table border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="7"><tr><td width="80" align="center" valign="top"></td><td valign="top"><br /><div><img alt="" height="1" width="1"/></div><div><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&amp;fd=R&amp;usg=AFQjCNERpUQ4fBxUFUwGfiOemH5lKfCU_Q&amp;url=http://www.leagle.com/unsecure/page.htm?shortname%3Dincaco20100728010"><b>PEOPLE v. FOREST</b></a><br /><b>Leagle.com</b><br />The portion of the email discussing making money referred not to drugs, but to Forest's proposition that the man accept a role in a pornographic <b>movie</b>. <b>...</b><br /><br /><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://news.google.com/news/more?ned=us&amp;ncl=dvFnS2mYgAYUJpM"><b>and more&nbsp;&raquo;</b></a></div></td></tr></table>" (...Read More...)
top ⇑ Discussion & CommentsDiscussion & Comments